A federal judge in Boston has temporarily halted the Trump administration’s push to collect detailed admissions data from universities to verify compliance with the ban on race-based admissions, according to a report by The Associated Press (AP). The ruling comes amid a broader legal battle over how the federal government enforces the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision striking down affirmative action.
Court flags procedural lapses in data demand
U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV granted a preliminary injunction on Friday, siding with a coalition of 17 Democratic state attorneys general who challenged the directive, AP reported. The order applies to public universities in the plaintiff states.While acknowledging that the federal government likely has the authority to request such data, the court found the implementation deeply flawed. Judge Saylor noted that the administration imposed a 120-day deadline that resulted in a “rushed and chaotic” rollout, preventing meaningful consultation with institutions.The ruling also criticised the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) for failing to adequately engage universities during the notice-and-comment process, raising concerns over procedural lapses.
States cite privacy risks and compliance burden
The lawsuit argued that the data collection effort could compromise student privacy and expose institutions to unwarranted federal scrutiny. States also contended that universities were not given sufficient time to compile and report the extensive datasets required.Quoting court proceedings, AP noted that plaintiffs’ counsel argued the directive appeared aimed at uncovering violations rather than ensuring compliance, warning it would create operational challenges for institutions.
Policy tied to affirmative action enforcement
The data collection order stems from President Donald Trump’s August directive, issued after concerns that universities were using indirect methods—such as personal essays—to factor race into admissions decisions.As reported by AP, this follows the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling that prohibited the explicit use of race in admissions while allowing applicants to discuss how race has influenced their experiences.Under the policy, colleges were required to submit disaggregated data on applicants, admitted students and enrollees by race and sex, with retrospective reporting spanning seven years. Non-compliance could trigger penalties under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, potentially affecting access to federal student aid.
Broader pressure on elite institutions
The administration has defended the move as necessary for transparency in federally funded institutions. According to AP, similar data-sharing requirements were part of settlement agreements with Brown University and Columbia University, allowing them to restore federal research funding in exchange for disclosures and audits.In a parallel development, the administration has also sued Harvard University over similar data demands. Federal officials have warned the university could face legal consequences if it fails to comply within a stipulated timeline, AP reported.
